<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Quantum — Engineering Blog</title>
    <link>https://quantum-ui.com/blog</link>
    <atom:link href="https://quantum-ui.com/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Engineering blog from the Quantum team on AutoML, MLOps, feature stores and enterprise ML.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:41:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>The POC-to-Production Graveyard — Where 87% of ML Projects Go to Die</title>
      <link>https://quantum-ui.com/blog/poc-to-production-graveyard</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://quantum-ui.com/blog/poc-to-production-graveyard</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Your notebook model hit 0.94 AUC. The business loved the demo. Six months later, nothing shipped. Here is the map of where ML projects actually get killed, and what separates the survivors.</description>
      <author>noreply@quantum-ui.com (Bryam Camilo Acevedo)</author>
      <category>mlops</category>
      <category>production</category>
      <category>automl</category>
      <category>feature store</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Data Leakage — The Silent Killer That Makes Your Model Look Brilliant Until Launch</title>
      <link>https://quantum-ui.com/blog/data-leakage-silent-killer</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://quantum-ui.com/blog/data-leakage-silent-killer</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Your model hit 0.97 AUC on the test set. Then production happened and it dropped to 0.68. The gap between those numbers almost always has the same name. Here is how to find it before your launch day does.</description>
      <author>noreply@quantum-ui.com (Bryam Camilo Acevedo)</author>
      <category>data leakage</category>
      <category>model evaluation</category>
      <category>automl</category>
      <category>best practices</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XGBoost Will Beat Your Neural Network 9 Times Out of 10 (Sorry, GPU Folks)</title>
      <link>https://quantum-ui.com/blog/xgboost-beats-neural-network</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://quantum-ui.com/blog/xgboost-beats-neural-network</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Tabular data is 80% of enterprise ML. Gradient-boosted trees are still the champion of tabular, and a well-tuned XGBoost will out-predict a transformer on most of your real problems. Here is the benchmark, and here is when to use each.</description>
      <author>noreply@quantum-ui.com (Bryam Camilo Acevedo)</author>
      <category>xgboost</category>
      <category>neural networks</category>
      <category>tabular</category>
      <category>benchmarks</category>
      <category>automl</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
